1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 180 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 2006 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Arcadia | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 251 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7150 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1410 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3850 mm |
