1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,206 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (161 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 2009 Mazda 6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1996 Daewoo Arcadia has manual transmission. 1996 Daewoo Arcadia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Arcadia | 6 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 2261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4710 mm |