1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia.
Because 2010 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Daewoo | Holden |
Model | Arcadia | UTE |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3206 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 242 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |