1996 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 2010 Nissan Murano
To start off, 2010 Nissan Murano is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Arcadia would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Murano (265 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Murano weights approximately 174 kg more than 1996 Daewoo Arcadia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Arcadia | 2010 Nissan Murano | |
| Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
| Model | Arcadia | Murano |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3206 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 265 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1764 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4788 mm |
