1996 Daewoo Brougham vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Brougham (109 HP) has 56 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 320 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Brougham | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Daewoo | Zastava |
Model | Brougham | 1300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 53 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2430 mm |