1996 Daewoo Brougham vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Cervo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Brougham (109 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 765 kg more than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Brougham | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | Daewoo | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Cervo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 538 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2040 mm |