1996 Daewoo Brougham vs. 1988 Ford RS 200
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Brougham is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Ford RS 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Ford RS 200 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Ford RS 200 (247 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. (109 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Ford RS 200 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 20 kg more than 1988 Ford RS 200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Brougham | 1988 Ford RS 200 | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Brougham | RS 200 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1804 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |