1996 Daewoo Brougham vs. 2000 Renault Clio
To start off, 2000 Renault Clio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 365 kg more than 2000 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Brougham | 2000 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Daewoo | Renault |
| Model | Brougham | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2770 mm |
