1996 Daewoo Brougham vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Daewoo Brougham (109 HP) has 39 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 560 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Brougham | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Daewoo | MCC |
| Model | Brougham | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 70 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 1810 mm |
