1996 Daewoo Brougham vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. Both 1996 Daewoo Brougham and 2005 Suzuki Reno are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. (109 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 38 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1996 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Brougham | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Daewoo | Suzuki |
Model | Brougham | Reno |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2610 mm |