1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 1962 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 1962 Reliant Sabre Six is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Reliant Sabre Six. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 1962 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Nexia | 1962 Reliant Sabre Six | |
| Make | Daewoo | Reliant |
| Model | Nexia | Sabre Six |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2553 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
