1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 1963 Jaguar MK II
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 1963 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 1963 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Nexia | 1963 Jaguar MK II | |
| Make | Daewoo | Jaguar |
| Model | Nexia | MK II |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 120 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 195 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
