1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1975 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 1975 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 1975 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Nexia | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
| Model | Nexia | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
