1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 1980 Volvo 240
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 240 (152 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 1980 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 240 (240 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 1980 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 1980 Volvo 240 has manual transmission. 1980 Volvo 240 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 1980 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Nexia | 240 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |