1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp
To start off, 1996 Daewoo Nexia is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp | |
Make | Daewoo | De Tomaso |
Model | Nexia | Longchamp |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 5763 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 450 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |