1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daewoo Nexia | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Ford |
| Model | Nexia | TS-50 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
