1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Nexia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Daewoo Nexia (138 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1996 Daewoo Nexia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 2000 Seat Arosa has manual transmission. 2000 Seat Arosa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Daewoo | Seat |
Model | Nexia | Arosa |
Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |