1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (189 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 2005 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (220 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. 1996 Daewoo Nexia has automatic transmission and 2005 Mazda RX-8 has manual transmission. 2005 Mazda RX-8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Daewoo Nexia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Nexia | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |