1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 2006 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2006 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daewoo Nexia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (212 HP @ 7500 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Because 2006 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daewoo Nexia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda RX-8 (216 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 2006 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Nexia | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7500 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 216 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |