1996 Daewoo Nexia vs. 2012 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daewoo Nexia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daewoo Nexia would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (218 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daewoo Nexia. (138 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daewoo Nexia.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daewoo Nexia | 2012 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | Nexia | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 138 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |