1996 Daihatsu Charade vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1996 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1996 Daihatsu Charade. (89 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Daihatsu Charade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 100 kg more than 1996 Daihatsu Charade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daihatsu Charade. (121 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daihatsu Charade.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Daihatsu Charade | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Charade | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 121 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2210 mm |