1996 Daihatsu Mira vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Daihatsu Mira. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Daihatsu Mira would be higher. At 659 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Daihatsu Mira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1996 Daihatsu Mira. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1996 Daihatsu Mira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Daihatsu Mira weights approximately 415 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1996 Daihatsu Mira is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Daihatsu Mira will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Daihatsu Mira. (100 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Daihatsu Mira.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Daihatsu Mira | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Daihatsu | MCC |
| Model | Mira | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Engine Size | 659 cc | 598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1155 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1520 mm |
