1996 Dodge Avenger vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 1996 Dodge Avenger is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda 929 (145 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1996 Dodge Avenger. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 1996 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1986 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda 929 (230 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Dodge Avenger. (180 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Avenger | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Avenger | 929 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2720 mm |