1996 Dodge Caravan vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Dodge Caravan (148 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Caravan | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Dodge | MCC |
| Model | Caravan | Smart |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1460 mm |
