1996 Dodge Caravan vs. 2010 BMW 320

To start off, 2010 BMW 320 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Caravan would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW 320 (182 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1996 Dodge Caravan. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW 320 should accelerate faster than 1996 Dodge Caravan.

Because 2010 BMW 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 BMW 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 BMW 320 (380 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Dodge Caravan. (262 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2010 BMW 320 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Dodge Caravan.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Dodge Caravan 2010 BMW 320
Make Dodge BMW
Model Caravan 320
Year Released 1996 2010
Body Type Minivan Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 114 HP 182 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 262 Nm 380 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2750 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4624 mm
Vehicle Width 1960 mm 1811 mm
Vehicle Height 1790 mm 1384 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2810 mm