1996 Dodge Caravan vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Caravan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Caravan would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 4 kg more than 1996 Dodge Caravan.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Caravan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Dodge Caravan. (262 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Dodge Caravan.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Caravan | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Dodge | Ferrari |
| Model | Caravan | California |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 262 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1705 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2670 mm |
