1996 Dodge Dakota vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 2,458 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Dodge Dakota (118 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1996 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Dakota | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Dakota | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2458 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2490 mm |