1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220 weights approximately 297 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1954 Mercedes-Benz 220 | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ram | 220 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2910 mm |