1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 67 kg more than 1959 Volvo 120.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Volvo 120. (118 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Ram | 120 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5200 cc | 1580 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 76 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2610 mm |
