1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1970 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 102 kg more than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 290 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1970 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 157 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2480 mm |