1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1970 Subaru FF-1
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Subaru FF-1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Subaru FF-1 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 360 kg more than 1970 Subaru FF-1.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1970 Subaru FF-1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 348 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Subaru FF-1. (99 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Subaru FF-1.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 1970 Subaru FF-1 | |
| Make | Dodge | Subaru |
| Model | Ram | FF-1 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 80 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 726 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2430 mm |
