1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1978 Volvo 240
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 240 would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volvo 240. (160 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1978 Volvo 240 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Ram | 240 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 160 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2650 mm |