1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1980 Mazda 323
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 323 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 276 kg more than 1980 Mazda 323.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1980 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 323 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2320 mm |