1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 264 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Dodge | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ram | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2680 mm |