1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1985 Volvo 780
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Volvo 780. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Volvo 780 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Volvo 780 weights approximately 334 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Volvo 780. (236 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Volvo 780. 1985 Volvo 780 has automatic transmission and 1996 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 1996 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1985 Volvo 780 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 1985 Volvo 780 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | Ram | 780 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1985 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1420 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2780 mm |
