1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1986 Subaru Rex
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Subaru Rex. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Subaru Rex would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 507 kg more than 1986 Subaru Rex.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Subaru Rex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Subaru Rex. (43 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Subaru Rex.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1986 Subaru Rex | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Ram | Rex |
Year Released | 1996 | 1986 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 544 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 31 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 43 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 555 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2260 mm |