1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1989 Mazda 626
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Mazda 626 would be higher.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1989 Mazda 626, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1989 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 626 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1989 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2520 mm |