1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1991 Mazda 121
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 242 kg more than 1991 Mazda 121.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda 121, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 343 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Mazda 121. (104 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Mazda 121.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1991 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 121 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 1322 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 104 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2460 mm |