1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1991 Renault Clio
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Renault Clio would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 276 kg more than 1991 Renault Clio.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Renault Clio. (182 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 1991 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Dodge | Renault |
| Model | Ram | Clio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 48 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 182 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 810 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2470 mm |
