1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1992 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 6 kg more than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Nissan Pulsar. (147 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1992 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Ram | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1996 | 1992 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2440 mm |