1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1995 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1996 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 126 kg more than 1995 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 318 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Volkswagen Polo. (129 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1995 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Ram | Polo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1995 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 73 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 129 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2410 mm |