1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1997 Rover 200
To start off, 1997 Rover 200 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 32 kg more than 1997 Rover 200.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 200, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 200. (128 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1997 Rover 200 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Ram | 200 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 128 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2510 mm |