1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1998 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 1998 Fiat Bravo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 128 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Fiat Bravo. (186 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1998 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Dodge | Fiat |
Model | Ram | Bravo |
Year Released | 1996 | 1998 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 152 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 186 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2670 mm |