1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1323 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Dodge Ram. (447 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Dodge | Ford |
Model | Ram | Econoline |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 474 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 2385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 3510 mm |