1996 Dodge Ram vs. 1999 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1999 Toyota Celica is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Toyota Celica weights approximately 4 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Toyota Celica. (172 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 1999 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Ram | Celica |
Year Released | 1996 | 1999 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 172 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2510 mm |