1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2001 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2001 Subaru Outback is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,200 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Subaru Outback weights approximately 428 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 2001 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Dodge Ram. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Subaru Outback. (223 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Subaru Outback.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2001 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Dodge | Subaru |
Model | Ram | Outback |
Year Released | 1996 | 2001 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5200 cc | 2455 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 154 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 223 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1062 kg | 1490 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3530 mm | 2660 mm |