1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Holden Monaro
To start off, 2003 Holden Monaro is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Holden Monaro weights approximately 516 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Monaro. (374 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Monaro. 2003 Holden Monaro has automatic transmission and 1996 Dodge Ram has manual transmission. 1996 Dodge Ram will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Holden Monaro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2003 Holden Monaro | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Monaro |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 229 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 374 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1602 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2800 mm |