1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mitsubishi Magna weights approximately 369 kg more than 1996 Dodge Ram.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna. (255 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mitsubishi Magna.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Dodge Ram | 2003 Mitsubishi Magna | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ram | Magna |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 255 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 1455 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2730 mm |
