1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Rover City
To start off, 2004 Rover City is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Rover City, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2004 Rover City | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Ram | City |
Year Released | 1996 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2410 mm |