1996 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Dodge Ram weights approximately 108 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Lupo.
Because 1996 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Dodge Ram (447 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Volkswagen Lupo. (152 Nm). This means 1996 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Volkswagen Lupo.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Dodge Ram | 2005 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Ram | Lupo |
Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 447 Nm | 152 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1086 kg | 978 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5190 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2330 mm |